John's "Take 'em to the Bank" Predictions
Ben did a top notch job with his preseason predictions, I must say I don’t disagree hugely with anything in there, I'll try to point out what does differ. Normally I do mine the first day of the regular season but I’m a little behind this year. I also never pick preseason Cy Young, MVP, or ROY since those all tend to be decided too much on the most flawed of baseball stats. How would I even begin to predict what pitcher would get the run support, who would hit for the highest average, etc? I hope that my predictions here haven’t been influenced by what’s happened so far, but here goes:
AL East:
1. Yankees
If there is one thing I’ve learned about baseball from years of watching the results, it’s that if something keeps happening repeatedly that seems to defy mathematical or intuitive reason, the reasoning is probably faulty. The fact that the Yankees continue to finish first in the AL east year after year despite having slightly weaker teams than the Red Sox seems to be one of these things. And the fact that they have won it two years in a row with a great offense but with an utterly offensive pitching staff leads me to believe that this similarly put together team will do the same.
2. Red Sox (Wild Card)
This is not to say the Red Sox will not stay right with the Yankees as they do most year. The Red Sox have an extremely talented team. They might be one of the dominant teams if not for the fact that they are about a year and a half from all of their young pitchers coming together and they are a couple years too late for other pitchers who no longer seem to be as consistently effective (Schilling, Wells, Foulke). If they manage not to lose much offense the next few years they could finally get over the hump and take the division, but I don’t see it happening yet.
4. D-Rays
AL Central:
1. Indians
Kenny Williams makes bad moves hoping he will be seen as trendy, and his team works like magic (think the 2002 Angels). The same thing kind of happened in the 2004 Red Sox year, Nomar was traded and a few weeks later the team took off. Did they take off due to improved defense? Hah the Twins wish defense was that important. No, they were just a stacked team that took a while to achieve their expected output. Taking into account why the White Sox succeeded in 2005 one might think a repeat performance is unlikely, but this time Kenny Williams changing things up was a good thing. He either realized that his team wasn’t as good as advertised or he just likes making a lot of moves nomatter what happens. But in either case the team improved on paper a lot in the 2005 offseason, which should keep them in the hunt this year even if some guys come back to earth and the inevitable injuries to pitching occur.
3. Twins
4. Tigers
5. Royals
AL West
1. A’s
I must say I agree whole-heartedly with Ben’s assessment of the A’s as being the team to beat in mlb this year. For all the moneyball misinterpretations out there, Billy Beane continues to find what is undervalued by his fellow gms and mercilessly acquire it. The A’s also seem to have a knack for spotting young pitching talent, as their staff is stocked to the brim with it, even after letting go co-aces Mulder and
2. Angels
Where is this team going? I’m not exactly sure. I don’t think it’s up though. They keep coming up empty on some players who could really help, and everyone keeps getting older without the young guys really threatening to pick up the slack. I think this team could fall hard and fast given a carefully placed injury (VLAD!), but if everything goes according to plan their starting pitching will be decent, their relief work stellar, and their lineup eh… This team isn’t as bad as Gritz would have you believe though, there is a lot of value for a team’s W-L from a pitching staff that refuses to walk people, but as long as the lineup also doesn’t walk or protect their precious few baserunners the Angels won’t see 1st for a while.
3. Rangers
4. Mariners
Remember when
NL East:
1. Braves
The talent pool of the Braves pitching staff has been steadily and painfully eroding the past few years. Digging deeper into last year’s numbers makes for much worrying, as I plan to write a blog about soon. Position player strength has been increasing steadily though, as their very young hitters continue to mature. The question is, can a team with a pitching staff held together by duck tape and a whole lot of raw hitting talent win the NL East over the Mets? Probably not, but with Bobby Cox at the helm anything seems possible. This year is the most likely one yet for their string of 15 straight divisional titles to end but I’m going to pick them for 1st one last time.
2. Mets (Wild Card)
After spending ridiculous amounts of money 2 years straight the Mets finally have a contender. What they have is a kind of “let’s win now and pick up the pieces later” kind of team stocked with over the hill talent. It’s the widely spaced young studs (David Wright chiefly) that will take them where they’re going though. This team should not miss the playoffs, and very well may win the division. The coming years should be very interesting as their pitching and sluggers continue to age quickly, the question will be whether they will be able to rebuild around Wright and Reyes.
3. Phillies
Finishing only 2 games out of the division title last year was this teams last hurrah. The window is closed for the playoffs until they get some pitching. After coming up empty looking for a #1 starter, this team is destined to play another year like the Rangers, never being able to score enough to offset the terrible pitching. It’s too bad because Utley, Howard, Abreu, and Burrell is one of the best middle of the lineups out there.
4. Nationals
This team has good enough pitching to keep it somewhat interesting, it’s the hitting that is terrible. Gritz is right the stay at the top of the division in 2005 was a fluke, but not the overall pitching the Nats received, which should keep them out of last in 2006. Nick Johnson would be a serviceable #3 or excellent #5 hitter in a lot of lineups, but in
5. Marlins
How can you predict a team’s success when nearly the entire roster has been turned over? Well it’s pretty easy when all the replacements are prospects who probably shouldn’t even be in the majors yet. The pitching on the other hand is more a bunch of retreads behind Willis than promising youngsters. They do have Cabrera and Willis for the time being, and this is the talent thin NL we’re talking about, so they won’t lose 115 games this year. An even 100 sounds about right.
NL Central
1. Cardinals
I don’t necessarily see this as a weaker team than last year’s 100 win team. I think any regression will mostly be due to the division strengthening and less important parts of the lineup not being as good. The main pieces of the juggernaut of the last few years are still here, so I expect nothing less than a division title along with a strong playoff showing. The big worry would be if all those innings finally started to catch up with Carpenter.
2. Brewers
This team is good. They’re better than your neighbor thinks they are, and they’re better than most baseball fans think. Good starters, good lineup, good bullpen, a balanced team that doesn’t wow you with any part, but nearly every part is steadily improving. Like the Blue Jays in this way, they only need one of their elite talents to step it up to push them over the top into the limelight. If Ben Sheets can just stay healthy, then he may push for the NL Cy young this year, and the Brewers definitely threaten 90 wins. The team is in a very good position right now, young players all over the diamond along with increased fan interest/revenue from a winning team should propel them into playoff contention for the next several years.
3. Cubs
The Cubs and question marks, two things that were made for each other. Will Prior be healthy? Will Wood finally get healthy? Will Miller recover from surgery? Will the bullpen work together? Can
4. Astros
Barring a Clemens return the rotation is much weaker here. It’s just unlikely that Pettite and Oswalt are going to duplicate their spectacular seasons and make this team a contender. This they could easily finish 3rd but I think there is going to be a rapid dropoff pretty soon (like the Mariners team a few years ago that suddenly got old).
5. Reds
Great hitting, terrible pitching, what else is new for the Reds? I don’t think they’ll be cellar dwellers just because their hitting is that good. The pitching might actually not be as terrible as recent years, since Harang and Arroyo are at least average starters, not something the Reds have had a whole lot of in recent years. There are also some young effective arms in the bullpen for once. The Reds could get real hot at times, but shouldn’t finish any higher than this.
6. Pirates
Think the Brewers two years ago. That means there is finally some talent on the farm and some very young talent on the major league roster. It’s not going to produce many wins this year, but it is nice to finally see them start to go in the right direction. They do have one of the better all-around outfielders in baseball in
NL West
1. Padres
By far the hardest division in baseball to pick, there just simply is not much talent in this division, any team that wins it is going to do it despite having serious flaws. Take the 2005 Padres for example: a horrible back end of the rotation, a barely mediocre offense, and a division title. I think it will end up this way again because I do think they had the best team last year and were held back somewhat with injuries, and if anything they improved the roster over the offseason. Just look out, if Peavy is not at top form they are in serious trouble.
2. Dodgers
None of these picks are easy, since you can make a case for every single team here to win the division. The Dodgers, compared to everyone else here, probably have the best talent available. The problem is that so much of it is injured. Gagne’s injury problems change the whole complexion of the bullpen. If the lineup could ever stay healthy together (namely if Drew and Garciaparra could play 150 games each) runs would not be a problem. Lack of a dominant rotation hurts more due to the likely weak lineup, and this should keep them struggling for .500 as opposed to leading the division.
3. Giants
The team with the oldest position players in baseball needs Bonds to be healthy to be considered a playoff contender. The roster is essentially in place the way it is because of Bonds, if he wasn’t around the organization would have gone younger a long time ago. Guys like Alou and Vizquel remain as valuable producers to compliment Bonds but without him the lineup’s numerous problems are completely exposed. Similarly the pitching is good enough with a healthy Schmidt but suspect otherwise. A tough pick to make, the Giants could run away from the pack with healthy years from their stars, but since that is looking less than likely I think a 3rd place finish is a pretty good bet.
4.
Only in this division would
5.
Sure they’re bad, but they might not be as bad as you think. The pitching (bullpen and starters) might be about as good as it’s ever been, and there are a few young lineup pieces to watch. It appears there just isn’t enough hitting here, which is exposed with their play on the road. Tightening up the pitching and defense on the road would really go far. That combined with a bounceback year from the injured Helton could get this team within 10 or so games of .500, a notable accomplishment in their uneven history.
Labels: predictions, sabesin2001
2 Comments:
I took them to the bank, but they uh, they told me that baseball predictions don't qualify as currency.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home